Casino Royale

Let me just start by saying that I was not and still am not a big fan of changing Pierce Brosnan to Daniel Craig, I didn’t think that the series needed a fresh face just yet. But after seeing this trailer, I’m still not happy with Daniel Craig, he’s not a good looking, suave 007, but the movie looks like its going to kick ass…and Eva Green is the Bond girl in it and she looks good in the part…I was however surprised to see Madam Judy Dench is still M, I thought this was a complete restart of the franchise. So unlike Batman Begins and Sum of All Fears both of which we restarts to their respective franchises (Batman and the Jack Ryan movies) this one seems to be a slight restart, I don’t think the franchise needs to be restarted, because 007 doesn’t seem to die or age, he just seems to continue…as if it were a soap opera…ok, enough stalling, here’s the damn link:

http://pdl.stream.aol.com/aol/us/moviefone/movies/2006/casinoroyale_018129/casinoroyale_trlr_01_maleos_hiq_dl.mov

–Socram

7 thoughts on “Casino Royale

  1. Yeah, this is going to suck…majorly. Pierce Brosnan was, and still is, James Bond. Period.

    This guy looks like just another blonde thug guy. Not James Bond in the least, he doesn’t appear suave or any of the other qualities associated with 007.

    I still think it was a stretch to replace Q’s character with John Cleese (as much as I am a Cleese fan). But hey, they seem to be doing what they want…whatever.

  2. I agree, you actually said it quite well, the guy looks like a blond thug. But they are doing whatever they want and if this one fails it’ll be all on them. and if it sucks, they it sucks to be them…

  3. most old school fans still like Sean Connory the best. My mom grew up with Roger Moore as Bond so she likes him the best. We grew up with Pierce Brosnan and I think he’s the best one.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *